6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

JMP $FCE2
User avatar
eslapion
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by eslapion »

It seems to be a well known fact that the 6510 supports the illegal op-codes of the MOS 6502, apparently a consequence of both having been made using NMOS process. It's also known that CMOS versions of the 6502, such as the popular Rockwell R65C02 do not support these op-codes.

But what about the 8500 which is a 6510 drop-in replacement made by MOS/CSG beginning in 1986 ? Does it support illegal 6502 op-codes too?

This CPU is 100% pin compatible with the 6510 and is used in many boards 250466 and the 64c's 250469. It was made using HMOS process technology which makes it consume a lot less power and produce virtually no heat. Does the change in manufacturing process have the same consequence as with the CMOS 6502 ?


Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. -John Steinbeck
tiny tim
Member
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:52 pm
Location: PAL
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by tiny tim »

At least the stable illegals and the "stable when used in a certain way" ones behave exactly the same.
User avatar
eslapion
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by eslapion »

tiny tim wrote:At least the stable illegals and the "stable when used in a certain way" ones behave exactly the same.
Thanks!

Do you know of any specific notable difference(s) between the 6510 and 8500 from a programming point of view ?
Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. -John Steinbeck
dudz
Member
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:40 am
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by dudz »

there is none, they behave exactly the same.
User avatar
eslapion
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by eslapion »

dudz wrote:there is none, they behave exactly the same.
Not sure I can buy that considering what you posted in other threads...
Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. -John Steinbeck
dudz
Member
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:40 am
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by dudz »

not sure if i give a damn, considering what you posted everywhere else.
User avatar
eslapion
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by eslapion »

dudz wrote:not sure if i give a damn, considering what you posted everywhere else.
Oh My!...

Image
Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. -John Steinbeck
User avatar
Gyro Gearloose
Member
Member
Posts: 471
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 5:20 am
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by Gyro Gearloose »

Girls, girls, girls.. You're BOTH pretty. Now stop it.
The price one pays for pursuing any profession, or calling, is an intimate knowledge of its ugly side.
tiny tim
Member
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:52 pm
Location: PAL
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by tiny tim »

^ this, or write test programs! :)
User avatar
eslapion
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: 6510 vs 8500 - support for illegal opcodes ?

Post by eslapion »

tiny tim wrote:^ this, or write test programs! :)
Would be nice if I knew what to look for...
Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. -John Steinbeck
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest