@yaztromo
It's a slim fit, second slimmest I could make it. Board measures 17.7x36.1mm so it's about the size of a 28 pin socket, shouldn't get in the way.

I got a new e-mail address to receive European orders:
u17plankton.eu [a with a tail] gmail.com

Guess so, that's what he wrote.

eslapion wrote:... fully compatible with all C64 boards, FastLoad ...

Here's that adapter on eBay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/111551006469 (PCB only) http://www.ebay.com/itm/121519109613 (Solder yourself version) If you have a computer with a poor functioning internal drive then it may not be a bad idea to put the Gotek internally, the same kind of switching can be done ...

Is this a general BASIC tip or for C64's version? I don't think I have ever used "LET", it's a waste of space and time. 60 input "enter the number"; a:rem a is for the number and b for the percentage 70 input "now enter the percentage of that number you want to work out"...

I've got two, have them mounted in external cases, I was going to install a DF1->DF0, DF2->DF1, DF0->DF2 switch (or something like that) so I can boot from the external drive and use the next one as DF1 - your ordinary two drive system but using external Goteks. But I don't like drilling holes in ca...

Sure, will e-mail...

Still a member, don't hang here much. The "sprites" in the PC versions would require two sprites in many forms and shapes, I have some drawn up but no…login to view the rest of this post

Seems like you'd find one way to achieve the same result and you'd just use that everywhere you would have used goto - if it's needed. I guess JMP in assembler is also bad then - as it's basically the same thing. Is GOTO considered bad practice, in retro computing, by whom? I've heard it before, who...

We saw some examples of that in the "No GOTO"-competition on REMOVED, but what's the point of it, is there a gain compared to using a goto? Shorter code, I think not. Is it faster? Possibly??

Sure, but why?

0 printchr$(205.4+rnd(.));:run